. .
Res Judicata A matter
adjudged; a thing judicially acted upon or decided; a thing or matter settled by judgment.
A phrase of the civil law, constantly quoted in the books. Rules that final judgment or decree on
merits by court of competent jurisdiction is conclusive of rights of parties or their privies in all later suits on points and matters determined in former suit. And to be applicable, requires identity in thing
sued for as well as identity of cause of action, of persons and parties to action,
and of quality in person for or against whom claim is made. The sum substance of the whole rule is that
a matter once judicially decided is
finally decided
|
. . Writs on this Page, and throughout this site, unless otherwise
stated, are typed on 8.5 x 14" paper. The history of legal paper is based on the scientific fact and anatomical harmony that if you were to hold up any
paper, including a roll or scroll, the range
of ease of reading, as it relates to eye, hand, and arm extension coordination, that could be read comfortably, does not extend beyond the scope of 14". . 
. THE WRITS ON THIS PAGE ARE OF NO COST!! AS THEY ARE FREE
TO STUDY and TO UTILIZE. .
.
'Posted 31st day of January, 2012 . . Greetings of Love and Peace, . We take this opportunity to reiterate the Writs on this ‘Writs of Freedom’
page are intended to serve as beacon lights and examples of expressing Law. The Writs do not necessarily make
you ‘Free’. It is your own comprehension, mental status and ability to express and stand on the
facts, that set you free. You must especially stand and let there be no reason for you not to
stand, no reason for you to back down or back out. Truth is Truthband it does not change nor pass away. Divine
lessons are first as that is the highest law. You will for certain, and with no doubt or contradiction,
find those can be found at the root of the Moorish Divine and National Movement of the World. The Circle ‘7’
Holy Koran is divinely prepared to do just that and are absolutely accurate in the instructions of same. We thank Noble
Drew Ali for that preparation. Chapter 3 – ‘The Unity of Life’, emphasizes you must “STUDY!,
STUDY!, STUDY!, and when you have studied well and ask what to study next, the reply is
to study Yourselves”. . A little bit of information is dangerous. It is usually the half-informed who fall into the snares
set for fools. Therefore,
we stress again, that the Writs assist you not to fall into snares. They do not necessarily save you because You save you. If we look again at the Chapter
‘3’ lesson, it also stresses that If man would find his Savior he must look within, his name is Self; and if man were to find his Devil
he must look within, his name is Self. Thus, we honorably ‘state for the record’ we are thankful for
any assistance we may offer in making your life experiences Moor bright, and we urge you to remember in all of your affairs
that every Natural Person is held liable for the Documents they put their Pen to and their autograph on, otherwise it could
be that their mental status is that of a 'minor', or of incompetence - the same thing. Minor has NOTHING to do with
an age or a count, or an otherwise constructed define. . Always remember:
“there is no one that is able to change
man from his descent Nature unless his power extends beyond the great God-Allah.”
.
Therefore NO ONE and can turn you into
a corporation no matter what they do, or have done. Do not let their presumptions and assumptions make that claim for
you or against you. Clearly they are in the arena of null and void abinitio, no matter what artifice they have made,
or intend to make. .
. 
Click here For Collective Violation Warning Form
,
posted 18th day of December 2012 . In Regards to "Boiler Plates" . It has come to our attention that many of the usurping
defactos, municipalities (Roman Venues), courts, government entities, etc. have declared that "Moors"
are utilizing "boiler plates" from websites and such "Writs" are not to be received by 'them' for that
reason. Let us with a reasoning mind, think about the FACT that there exist nothing but boiler plates when dealing with
those same entities. When utilizing an attorney, when going on a so-called government web-site; what is there but "Boiler
Plates" and forms to be filled out? These are assertions intended to discourage one from moving forward with
exercising their rights and remedies. . However, the most important and impactive problem you may experience is to submit a Writ that you
yourself do not overstand, inner stand and understand. This is usually
because you have not read it. Many think there is a 'silver bullet' that they can shoot, yet do not
know how to operate the device. This is attributed to a mind set that is looking for a saviour outside of themselves
studying and casting their own 'spells'. This is the direct effect of the 'spell' of the Christian Crusades, in other
words a European mindset and not a Moor National mindset. . Note: When ask "Do You Understand" in a court, know that that question in
its terminology is a 'lawful' question, answering it 'yes' means you stand under the jurisdiction and thereby submit
to their jursidiction. At the point that they realize you are NOT submitting because you have answerd "No I don't
undertand", they then turn the question into a comprehensive question and will suggest that you need a psychological
evaluation because you don't understand. DO NOT be shook by this, as this is the trickery, deceit and fraud. They
just attempted to flip the script. The answer to that from you is "I object, I am not suffering from constitutional
psychopathic inferiority.
Constitutional Psychopathic Inferiority: Individuals who show a lifelong and constitutional
tendency not to conform to the customs of the group, and who habitually misbehave, and have no sense of responsibility to
their fellow men or to society as a whole. These individuals fail to learn by experience and are inadequate, incompatible,
and inefficient. . Per the above definition, many of us have and still do in fact suffer 'constitutional psychopathic
inferiority'. Further, we are NOT aware that there are 2 different constitutions because the STATES can have their own,
but they cannot violate the Organic (Mother) constitution - Law of the Land. Resultantly many keep
trying to find, make, or exercise parity and equity with a feigned constitution (1870). It was not meant for you, not
talking to you, and we need to be very aware of that because even upon their feigned constitution it does not supercede the
organic. You need to know that, as otherwise you are "barking up
the wrong tree".
. About Paper Terrorism and Frivolous Claims? . If you have relied on prior decisions of the Supreme Court,
you have the perfect defense for willfulness.
U.S. v. Bishop, 412
US 346 .
We the people, are not anti-government! There exist many so-called government entities that
are in fact anti-government. We support and encourage support, of the North America Republic Constitution for the United States of America. The
only lawful form of government in this modernly referred to ‘American’ Land, and in all the states in the
Territory, is a Republican Form, which is guaranteed protection for all as stated in the Constitution, Article IV, Section IV. To
affirm for yourself, review the oaths of any and all Trustees/
Public Officials in your local city hall, county, municipalities, state and federal operations, et al. Each and
everyone of the agents, representatives, public officers are Trustees and they take an Oath to uphold the law
of the land. Their 'authority' is derived from it. They CANNOT create ANY ordinances, statutes,
rules, etc., that violate the laws already established as their guide as to how to behave and interact with the natural
people and other 'citizens'. (See Article VI). Their Oath is a public obligation. State Governments are but Trustees acting under a derived authority. 4 Wheat 402
Anyone who denies or abrogates the
law of the land is the "LAW BREAKER". Taking the Oath to the Constitution is what gets a Government Official / Trustee/ Public Servant in the seat
in the first place. Failure to uphold the law and the Oath to it, and any violation made against the law of the
land, is warring against the people. “ . No
state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution
without violating his undertaking to support it.” Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958). . “The court is to protect against any encroachment of Constitutionally secured
liberties.”
Boyd v. U.S., 116 U.S. 616
. “Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right, from
liability.
For they are deemed to know the law.” Owen
v. Independence, 100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 622
. THE QUESTION IS ARE YOU IN A COURT OF LAW with a JUDGE PRESIDING OR IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE VENUE WITH A HEARING
OFFICER? . LACK OF TAKING OATH Does NOT exempt anyone from the Law
of the land. .
Whether they have or have
not taken the Oath, they are bound by the Laws of the land, (as are the people) and if they are sitting in the ‘seats
of government’ ie. Public officials, Officers of the Court, etc., and are violating the established rules of law, then
they are Impersonating an Officer of the Court / Inpersonating a Government Official / A Public Official
/ Impersonating a Trustee. They are imposters, Therefore, they can be charged and found guilty
of same, or guilty of Treason, which is highly penal. (particularly by the International World Criminal Court) of such
violations. Moors issues are IN FACT International. If they have taken the oath or not
and abrogate the laws of the land, then they have no authority over the people what-so-ever and/or have quit their job,
their fiduciary duty to the people. Prima Facie evidence of same is found easily in the documents (paper) they submit
in written form from their perspective Offices which deny the people's rights and remedies. Even more impacting
is when they submit judicial decisions when they are NOT a valid judicial court and DO NOT possess lawful jurisdiction
to adjudicate upon the people. Their acts are 'paper terrorism'. The submission of such papers from
them is frivolous and is 'paper terrorism'. When they deny your rights and refuse to accept your lawful paperwork
that scribes your position on paper, they are committing paper terrorism because all lawful intent must first be given
via 'Lawful Notice'. That is why you MUST submit the same. you also must recognize that they give 'Notice",
which is notice of their intent, however you must Rebut it, if it is not supportive of your position or if it is unlawful
intent. So, are they afraid of getting a paper-cut?, is that what they are calling terroristic? Their refusal
to acknowledge Notice(s) / paperwork from you, the people, of which they are a public servant for, renders them treasonist,
renders them the ‘paper terrorist’ and renders them
as the law breakers. All who do not know this are ignorant
of the Law. All who do know and insist on proceeding outside of the established Law of the Land, are anti-government and are committing Treason!! Let's look at the case laws regarding Defective Writs. Upon doing so, you
will see who the paper terrorist really are.
.
A Writ may be void because it is
defective in language, because the court had no jurisdiction to issue the writ; Big Torts
122 Nixon v. Reeves, 65 Minn. 159, 67 n.W. 989, 33 L.R.A. 506. See
Bouviers Law Encyclopedia Rawles 3rd revision Pg. 1182. . The Clerk of the court who issues a defective writ,
or one not authorized by the Court, is liable; and so is a judge who orders a writ which he had
no right to issue or where he had no jurisdiction. Big Torts 128 see Bouviers Law
Encyclopedia Rawles 3rd revision Pg. 1182.
.
. .
Whereas, Supreme Court decisions are “Stare Decisis”,
also referred to a "Res Judicata", upon ALL Courts, including Municipal tribunal inferior courts, one must take into
serious consideration that most all of the paperwork received from these tribunals are Void and are prima facie evidence of
‘Paper Terrorism”. Below is a PDF containing what a Void Judgment is and Supreme Courts Decisions regarding
Void Judgments. After reading
it, you will ascertain on your own that those courts, tribunals who are submitting Writs of Judicial Decisions are in fact
submitting defective writs and frivolous documents and they are the "Paper Terrorist"! The Natural people must begin to lien those who order them and execute them in both their private
citizen capacity and their professional capacity. The BIGGEST LIEN against them is the Constitution - Law of the Land.
In regards to adminstrative processes, keep in mind that these courts are adminstrative at best (unless they produce / show
a Delegation of Authority from Congress, pursuant to Article III of the Republic Constitution FOR the United States of America
(The Supreme Law of the Land). A Delegation of Authority spells out what they have jurisdiction over, if any, because
it is already established. That way noone has to argue or debate about it, just ask them to put it on the table.
Thing is the Legislature DOES NOT grant judicial authority to administrative courts.
"
Ministerial officers are incompetent
to receive grants of judicial power from the legislature,
their acts in attempting
to exercise such powers are necessarily nullities." Burns v. Sup.,
Ct., SF, 140 Cal.
1. Administrative rules are NOT rules
for the natural people. They are usually for the employees, federal employees-- which are public servants ONLY, rules
on the administration of whatever office they are administrating. There is a sanction against them for instance as stated
in USC 15, wherein if they have a Summary Trial and Judgement without 1.
getting permission of all parties - that means you. and 2.
If they don't produce (prior) the bonds of ALL Officers of the Court who are to be involved in the summary trial. It
is like a mal-practice insurance. The sanction is $10,000.00 per court officer involved in the process. Yet,
many who are perpetrating aren't even officers. What they have been doing all along and still do is have Summary
Judgements without due process, without a jury trial. This is probably the easiest thing they could have perfected in
the wake of lack of knowledge of the people, as the people have a responsibility to the law and to upholding and enforcing
it. Certainly in making sure they are not violated, as ignorance of the laws being no excuse, works both ways.
The definition of a civilian is one who is skilled in the law. The complexity is not knowing what law is and what law
is not, thus, not knowing that the law is really simple. The greatest right is the right to be left alone, provided
you do not infringe on anyone else's right to the same. Thus, there MUST be an injured party / complainant / accuser
/ or there can be no sanctions against you. Someone MUST be sitting in the accusers seat and it cannot be the State of
anything. Besides, if it were the state, all controversies regarding a state are to be held in the Supreme Court where
original jurisdiction rest. Says just that in Article III. So everybody seems to be ripping off of "lack of knowledge"
and if they did know, thenthey are tripping off of failure to exercise it, or what is called "Failure to Enforce the
Law" for generation, after generation, after generation. .
Law of Void Judgments and Supreme Decisions Regarding Them
.
Additional Info on Defective Writs and Void Judgments
.
Updated 18th day of December
2012 .
More on Writs and Lawful Terminologies on This Page and Throughout This Site . These
Writs are for those with a National Mindset and Consciousness. They are made available for Study, Review
and Application. Proper use comes with overstanding, understanding, followed by the innate power of inner-standing, which
means you "got it", and you are not wrongfully thinking that paper-work defines you, or who you are; it is a brief
regarding you, who you are, and defines your position regarding a matter. . Being aware that there may
be some who attempt to utilize these Writs, without the innerstanding, thus may find "they don't seem to work",
as only they will, if you "wear them with honor", and are able to stand on them squarely, upon any challenge. You
must know in your heart what is being stated, as you are stating it, and you will be challenged spiritually as well.
Words have power, and assist in creating your reality. . The Greater Truth is that there ought to be (more)
Organizations, and Aboriginal Law Associations / associates that exercise the "Protocols Of Liberty".
The only true Lawyer, is one who upholds the true and Supreme Law, which is the Constitution. Thus, one may say
they are a Constitutional Lawyer, of which, there essentially is no such thing because the Rule of Law is derived from the Constitution
and is universal, common to all, thus commonlaw can NEVER be extinct, because the Law is based in common principles.
All Law and all authority is derived from the Constitution. All Judges, and Officers of the Court take an Oath
to uphold it and derive their Authority from it. The Constitution does not list the unalienable birth rights that
you are born with, it preserves, protects and secures them. Governments are in place for the sole reason of protecting
and preserving the rights of the people.
. .In Propria Persona: In
one’s own proper person. It was formerly a rule in pleading that pleas to the jurisdiction of the court must be plead
in propria persona, because if pleaded by an Attorney they admit the jurisdiction, as an Attorney
is an Officer of the Court, and he is presumed to plead after having obtained 'Leave', which
admits the jurisdiciton.
.
Once
one becomes a client of an Attorney, they also become by default a 'ward of the court'.
A Lawyer is a "Law-Man" or Lay man and a Civilian is one who is skilled
in the law, therefore everyone ought be at minimum civil. An attorney is an officer of the court (their feigned
court) and once you hire an attorney, you become a ward of the court - simply true. Things are considered simplified
when one says it in "lay man terms....", meaning in "law-man terms". The Law resides with
and within you, as you are the Law. A good question to ask yourself is what is an Attorney-at-Law? It
is just what it states, one who is practicing at Law, one who is twisitng it and denoting 'color-of-law,
which means a symblance of that which is real, but is not the Law. Law is common to all and there exist no license to practice law, or to exercise your Rights / Liberties born with. Thus there is no such
thing as a 'Licensed Attorney'. He or she may have a 'bar associatin membership card, but that IS NOT a license.
The definition (above) of one who is 'in propria persona' (proper person / natural person), brings forth the
truth regarding an Attorney. .
And there you have it. An Attorney is
a Bounty Hunter with a suit and tie on. He brings you before the Court and Leaves you there.
Thus the Court has Leave over you (which means jurisdiction over you). An Attorney is an Officer
of the Court, thus his obligation is and always will be to the Court first and not to you. To
add insult to the injury, or to the corruption, the Court he is obligated to is a defacto court, a colorable court, operating
in Collusion, and in color-of-Office and color-of-law. This is more reason why you cannot utilize an Attorney.
An attorney speaks for inanimate objects, corporations, who cannot speak for themselves. He or she possesses
a Bar Association Card, which is a membership card -- it is not a license, besides that a license to
practice law does not exist. As well, a license is permission to do something that is otherwise
unlawful. Utilizing an Attorney admits you to their Venue, which is really a Hearing room, athough they dress up
and perform otherwise, which is ABSOLUTELY ludicrous, they have no jurisdiction over you, and they are playing house and dress
up.
.
They are inferior Courts, they are not judicial functions. as
such they possess no delegation of authority. Why - because legislation DOES NOT give grants of judicial power
to administrative courts. Boy, have we been duped! Municipal
courts, Administrative Courts, and Officers of such Courts, administrators, Agencies and agents alike, etc., operate under
Color-of-Law, even though they have taken an Oath to uphold the Constitution, and the laws of the United States (USC
Codes). They have created a colorable jurisdiction, because they have no Jurisdiction, certainly NOT over the Natural, National, flesh and blood being (natural person). Remeber there
are 2 types of persons, one is natural, the other is a fiction. Colorable persons or fictitious, persons, corporate
persons, chattel property, fall up under their colorable jurisdiction. This is why it is so very important to Declare
your Natural Status. Their authority is over those who subscribe to them, who are members / citizens (same thing).
Examples; Union States (U.S.) Citizens, corporations, those who are labeled Indian, Negroe, Colored, Black, etc.
Thus, it is quite necessary for you to Declare you are not a corporate person, nor are you a member of the Union States Society.
This is done through the universal process of Declaring it, some call it Nationalization, of which they seem
to despise the word national - don't they? It is not to
be confused with Naturalization (a colorable process of becoming a citizen of the u.s.a. (So don't be tricked into that).
First you must be a National, then
you can claim and do national things - trade, activity, etc. and of course putting yourself in a natural, national status
you claim your inheritance, your (seeming) lost estate. Declaring your Nationality indicates your natural,
natinal status and links you back to the human family, and the Family of Nations. . There is a need for people to overstand
the "Rudder and The Sextant", which is an explanation of the operations or navigation of protocols
and governing principles, as the "Great Seal Association" was established for that purpose
to affectuate those measures. These principles must be activated as a group Association with qualified
associates. Dues can be taken, particularly for a "Defense Fund", for anyone who is in need of protocols
being expressed, i.e., they have been kidnapped and in need of a Habeas Corpus. A National on the outside can speak
for them as Counsel (Article III). That does not mean an attorney, nor does it mean a Consul from a Consular court,
as that would mean you are a foreigner and you are not in your own land. A Friend of the Court is also not so hot to
do. Why be a friend of a court that is not a court. You are not actually a friend of such colorable
Courts, which is why one must be careful in making that statement especially for the record of a colorable, defacto tribunal.
It could mean you are a friend of Law and Due Process of Law. You can speak for another, however you can never represent
another. They can enter documents into the Court and make Lawful Commands to the Court, on their behalf.
That activity is what Nationhood is. See "Do You Need License To Counsel" on Law page of our expanded site. . Writing is "spelling", casting spells, as has been executed
upon the masses for domination and control. (save the physical force), which is cloaked behind the act of making
offers in writing to coerce you towards making a commitment (contract) that you don't have to make. This makes the intent
of domination easier. Failing to respond in Law indicates that things stand, because there is no rebuttal,
no response. This is why often you are given 10 days, or so, to respond. . The offers that are
made to you do not have to be accepted by you. However, you must respond to those offers in
writing. Although the written documents you receive, or that are placed before you to sign, may be written with
an air of authority, it does not mean that the agency, association, etc., who wrote them to you, is the authority,
or holds any authority over you. One must prove such authority to you. Upon that proper request for them to prove
their authority, you will find the authority they appear to have, does not exist! .
Writs are a matter of Lawful correspondence. In fact always head everything as an "Affidavit"
-- not a "Motion". A Motion gives them the option to refuse it, as it is in most corporate
or social membership meetings, a Motion needs to be seconded, and if not, it does not stand. You must respond and
correspond in Law, in writing with Affidavits, as in an "Affidavit of Fact", or Affidavit of Truth, then choose
your subheading as it relates to the matter you are dealing with, i.e. "Demand For Dismissal", "Summary
Judgement", "Cause Of Action", "Right Of Action", "Judicial Notice', "Writ In Nature Of
Discovery", (Bill Of Particulars), Name Reclamation", etc. . A Ticket
/ Summons is a Suit against you, you must counter it Lawfully. Although it has been presented unlawfully,
because the person who brings suit against you cannot serve you too, and they certainly can't also be the witness for
prosecution. Many hats a simple police man (policy enforcer) wears while his actions are a violation of separation
of powers. By doing so, he is acting unlawfully in both his professional and personal capacity, and / is acting
under the Color-of Office and Color-Of-Law. Often, particularly regarding traffic, Officers are acting as "Collection
Agents, for other agencies, and are taking action against you for a supposed debt, or "failure to pay" a contract
(that doesn't lawfully exist), usually a surcharge, which in itself is an unlawful impost. Therefore, at the moment
of hindering you from traveling, he is acting as an agent for an agency, and not as a public trustee. This is the game
that has been used against the people to exploit them while also violating their substantive rights. .
There is Law (proper), and there is "Color-of-Law, a semblance of that which is real--yet is not. This they practice daily upon the
masses. There is a Corporate Person, (a corporation), and there is a Natural Person (You). A Natural
Person can be injured, and when injured, remedy exist. In fact ,unless there is an injured party, there is no violation
before the court for you to seek remedy for. You can only either injure a body, injure property, or breach
a contract. Anything outside of that is not an injury and it violates your right to be left alone, to do as you freely
wish, provided you do not violate anyone else's right to the same. Yet, a fictitious person or corporation cannot be
injured. There are two different "Persons" at Law, and you must know the difference and know which one you
are or are not. . A Corporation
is a "Person", (Corporate Person), and then you are a Person (Natural Person). In Law there is "Civil Liter Mortus" meaning "dead in the eyes of the Law", and there is "In Full Life" thus one has Rights, which are preserved in Law (Constitution). Start to utilize the
Constitution for your preservation of Rights and your immunities. Get a law dictionary to look up these terms. You
must be conscious of the fact that you are a Natural Person by Nature, not a branded or labeled Person,
such as Negro, Colored, Black, African-American (which is an identification of two continents),
and is a Corporate or fictitious Person. These brands and labels that you may claim, if that is what you are claiming,
are not a part of the human family, thus have no Rights to be preserved for them or for their posterity. .
posted 2/8/15 Why Moors
DO NOT Petition and Cannot be "Petitioners' PETITION. A written address, embodying an application or prayer from the person or
persons preferring it, to the power, body, or person to whom it is presented, for the exercise of his or their authority
in the redress of some wrong, or the grant of some favor, privilege, or license. Enderson v. Hildenbrand, 52
N.D. 533, 204 N.W. 356; Benton Coal Mining Co. v. Industrial Commission, 321 Ill. 208, 151 N.E.
520, 522; In re L.M. Axle Co., C.C.A.Ohio, 3 F.2d 581, 582; State v. American Sugar Refining Co., 138 La. 1005, 71 So. 137,
140.
Who are you addressing to
give authority and power to and asking for permission from? You are always a Claimant or Counter Claimant, an Affiant,
one who writes an Affidavit – A Writ. You do not Petition, not in spirit, not in actuality. So a Petitioner
would be one who is making a prayer, and that does not mean you do not have hope or rather trust in whatever the matter is.
Respondent and Petition are colorable. A Suit is assumption of violation or breaking of agreement or of law and it is usually
served upon you without due process. Thus, noservice - no process. Even if served upon you with proper Due Process,
they see you as the Respondent or the Defendant (Alleged Defendant). They generally operate in presumptions and assumptions.
Presuming ou are not a flesh and blood natural being and assuming you are corporate person with no rights to be denied.
Stand differently, or these assumptions will remain in play.
State Courts operating today, are a Private corporation doing business
out of the Federal Court or a building, sometimes a Federal Building (literally renting space there), but they are
not a Federal District Court. They possess a tax ID number and an incorporation date. The States mimmick courts
in that they have an entire succession of so-called courts for you to Appeal to. The highest court they have is the
STATE Supreme Court, however that is not THE SUPREME COURT. Aha' gotcha'. They also have State District Courts
(usually in every county seat is), but still it is not the Federal District Court. For certainevery state has a Federal
court at the Capital, but they have Federal District courts spread out throughout the land, so that the people can have reasonable
access via travel. You can make contract via mail also if you don't want to travel, or are not able to, etc. At
any rate,they must be accessible within reason. See our "About "Removal to Federal Court" on the expanded site. The 9 Supreme Court Justices have a mailing location at D.C. The Supreme
Court of Commonwealth is the first lawful district court in the land and then congress adjourned in 1861. Remember Philadelphia
is the seat of Law - New York - the seat of Trade (thus the world trade center). You need to be sure you are not in
a rented meeting room that is not a lawfully sanctioned court room with oath bound Officers. Also note to yourself the
following:
“Officers of the court have no immunity, when violating a Constitutional right,
from liability, for they are deemed to know the law.” Owen v. Independence,
100 S.C.T. 1398, 445 US 622.
“Federal
law & Supreme Court cases apply to state court cases.” Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (1990) .
.
Respond or Tacidly Agree? Your acceptance of assumed authority and policies as Law, when they are NOT Law, makes them stand,
only for as long as you do not rebut them and when you continue to make and sign contracts or agreements regarding them. They
don't stand just because the agency, corporations, association, etc. says so --they stand because you say so, by not rebutting,
not responding and not rescinding signatures if and when necessary. (See Rescission of signature). Therefore you become a party to them, a party to the fraud. If there is no response from you, it means things stand
as they have stated, assumed, or coerced and put in writing (spelled). Usually you then sign whatever they have put
in writing, therefore, again, you are a party to the fraud. When you do sign something, it is usually under Threat,
Duress and coercion (T.D.C.). Anything done under threat, duress or coercion cannot stand in Law and is 'void'. See Law on Void Judgements and Info on Defective Writs. You must indicate the threat with your signature. If you do not spell it 'threat, duress and
coercion out, you can simply put 'T.D.C.' , which indicates you were under threat, duress and coercion and your Rights
were being violated by force. Generally and at a minimum, as a rule, you must sign any and
all things with "all rights reserved", or ou can put A.R.R., so that you can manage
your way out of anything that in fact abrogates your rights, with hidden adhesions, meaning they are under non-disclosed conditions
and if something is done without full disclosure , it is by law considered a void agreement or contract. , . Important Note: some say they are told
they cannot sign 'all rights reserved'. This is absurd! No one can tell you how to
sign your autograph. This is clear indication they those who told you this are intentionally trained to deprive you.
Even if it is part of their 'job-training' therefore they can claim they didn't know, still they are depriving you, and ignorance
of the law works both ways. What authority do they have to tell you how to sign or autograph? They need to receive from
you, a 'Notice of Color-of-Law Violations' to them personally.
Signature: The act of putting down a mans name at the end of an instrument to attest its validity , the name thus written. A "signature" may be written by hand, printed, stamped,
typewritten, engraved, photographed, or cut from one instrument and attached to another, and a signature lithographed on an
instrument by a party is sufficient for the purpose of signing it; it being immaterial with what kind of instrument a signature
is made. Smith v. Greenville County, 188 S.C. 349, 199 S.E. 416, 419. Maricopa
County v. Osborn, 60 Ariz. 290, 136 P.2d 270, 274. . And whatever mark, symbol, or device one may choose to employ
as representative of himself is sufficient. Griffith v. Bonawitz, 73 Neb. 622, 103 N.W. 327,
339. . Signature Manual: An autograph a signature;
specifically, the official signature of a sovereign, chief magistrate, or the like, to an official document as letters patent,
to give validity. Webster, Dict; Wharton, Law Dict.
.
You and I, are not intending to violate anyones policies, statutes or ordinances, however, we are not going to allow
anyone's policies, statutes and ordinances that they may call Law, violate our Rights and Liberties. This is upheld
in the American Constitution, Article VI. They can make statutes, policies, and ordinances, that they call Law, all day long, however if those
policies, statutes, ordinances, etc. violate our God-given, born with, Divine Rights, which are preserved to us (not given
to us) in the established rules of Law in the Constitution, they are not with standing (unless you are willing
to agree they are).
. So state your position in writing, and caste your "spells" well. Know
that all contracts are an offer that you may refuse, counter, deny, or accept, however it must be done in writing -- "The
Writ" -- the Spell-ing. . .
. Continue further
on this Page for Writs, of which there are many, already prepared and provided free on this page, for your Study and for your
use. .
.
 . Motions vs. Affidavits . It is ultra important to understand that you must head everything you submit in writing with
"Affidavit of Fact", because they can, and they do deny a "Motion", as motions
are discretionary and applicable to colorable courts, ordinances, statutes and codes, but not to LAW. Further
it applies to corporate, or colorable people (negroes, coloreds, blacks,etc.) because it is a discretionary action that can
be and usually is denied! denied! denied! . Note: As in a meeting, a motion requires a second and can be denied
without even being looked at, as these lower courts often do. An Affidavit of fact cannot lawfully
be denied, and must be visited and either answered or rebutted, otherwise it stands as Truth, or, if it requires an answer
by the court, it creates an injunction, and the court cannot lawfully move forward until answered. If not answered
the matter must be dismissed due to lack of due process of law, lack of prosecution. . The utilization of "Affidavit" MUST
BE THE ONLY FORM OF COMMUNICATION with the Court by a Sovereign or any person acting in a Lawful manner. . NOTE: NOTE: NOTE: Although a Motion is the proper form in a proper Court, as
opposed to Colorable Courts, most people are in fact dealing with and challenging the Jurisdiction of the Inferior
Courts, or COLORABLE Courts, who are NOT acting Lawfully or properly, and because a Motion ADMITS to the Jurisdiction
of the Court, and a Motion is DISCRETIONARY, the Court chooses not to honor the Motion, or not to Second it, thus
it is DENIED. . One must become sufficient enough in Law, and can, and does,
come into the Court with their flags, and fully know that while they could be Amicus Curae (a friend
of the Court) they can't be amicus curae if the Court is an unlawful court. How can they be a friend
of an unlawful court? They must be partial when it comes to colorable law. They can enter
the Court as Consul which is secured in the Constitution as your 'Right to Consul'. (Article III, Section
2 and in Vienna Convention, Article 36). In that position they are able to set the Court and the proceedings
in order within the bounds of Law, by their knowledge and their very being there in Special Appearance (not
general appearance). Special Appearance means they are NOT there in submission to the jursidiction of the
Court. General appearance means they are submitting to the jurisdiction of the court. How can you submit
to a court that has no jursidiction to adjudicate in the first place? Being present in 'Special Appearance' means you
are not there to be adjudicated upon, but only to clear up a matter(s). Once we get this innerstanding, we
may have possibly reached the goal for all Nationals, as they ARE THE LAW! They
are truly Law Abiding. The point, and the current challenge, is to know "What Law Is and What Law
Is Not". .
.
Updated August 21, 2012 . ABOUT WRITS OF DISCOVERY: In General, a Writ of Discovery is for the purpose of you asking and obtaining information
that they claim they have against you, so you can lawfully prepare a Case for your Defense. (However, in most of these colorable courts, there is no lawful Case and you are not a Defendant, but an Alleged
Defendant). The Writ of Discovery ask for information and include exculpatory
(things that show in your favor and things that are likely to be so upon a preponderance) and inclupatory information (things
that do not show in your favor, or can be considered likely even upon a preponderance). If you don't ask for both inculpatory
and exculpatory, they will likely ONLY provide teh inclulpatory information.
Discovery questions must be anwered in full all questions posed must be answered. All -- meaning each and EVERY question
asked MUST BE ANSWERED. To fail to answer any one question, is a failure to answer all questions. Thus, their
failure to answer is an automatic Default, as well, if they fail to answer, they are depriving you of the ability to
defend yourself against their allegations. (Prior to Default, is a 'Notice of Default', as lawful
correspondence are a matter of 'Notice'.
Even unto a so-called warrant from a municipal court (as a
municipal court cannot issue a warrant, what they are issuing is a "Bill of Exchange' as that is the definition of a
municipal warrant. If you read it carefully it says "Notice of Warrant', now they are waiting to see what
you do thereafter to injunct their process. Most agree that it is a warrant and most don't do anything to combat it.
Read Article IV of the Constitution to know what a warrant is supposed to look like. A warrant must be issued
by an Article III judge, not a Magistrate. Both the so-called Judge and the clerk of the court are responsible for defective
writs; the magistrate for ordering it to be issued and the Court clerk for issuing it. They make offers all day long,
and if left unanswered it becomes an action by Default, ot tacid agreement. So always response, rebutt and disclaim
their claims.
Most of the documentations coming from a colorable court are usually a threat and an unlawful
act on the part of the so-called Judge / Magistrate and the Court Clerk. (See Void Judgements
/ Defective Writs) . Everything you do must be done in writing. Be sure to have
the ticket/summons/suit number on it and an Exhibit number on it, as this makes it evidence in the matter,
and no one can tamper with evidence. Being marked exhibits is great for when you Remove to the Federal if they do not
dismiss the matter in the lower courts, however, don't wait for them to adjudicate because then it is not a removal, Your
position then must be an orginal suti. Removal must be done before hey adjudicaite. In these days and time you
mayy as well REmove it fairly quickly. I would say after you gave them the oportunity in the lower corut to dismiss
the nonsense and they instead keep making future court dates.
Do so in writing and let what you spell (Write
- Writ) speak for you. More and more we recognize that we are to ENFORCE THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND!, and not
allow anyone to violate it against us, as it, at minimum means we are retaining our rights and liberties via Due Process of
Law, through the organic Law of the land which preserves them.
.
GENERAL Writ Of Discovery
. Original 2009- Still
good today - Nunc Pro Tunc . . UPDATE 10/9/26 Go to our new expanded
site for an update on the Writ of Discovery asking ONLY 2 questions for their Delegation of Authority (to be a court with
judicial authority and for the updated Oaths of Offices for all supposed officers of said court. Without either, it
proves their fraud and matters must be dismissed. It is used primarily and especially with and for the updated Removal
to the Federal, wherein the first order is for the federal to execute the Discovery upon your opponent, setting the stage
for matters of Due Process, because if they do not have it, the matter must be dismissed. You will find information regarding
same on the new site on the Law is Law page Removal To Federal page. . .
Foreclosure Writ of Discovery & Disclosure
. Original 2009- still
good to day - Nunc Pro Tunc . . Update added 9/11/12: Also
See Mortgage Myth Page for additional questions for Discovery and for the "Reconveyance Letter",
utilized to reconvey Mortgage. Very effective after not receiving answers from Discoveries, or can be utilized
at any time to essentially fire the Trustee for their misrepresentation, fraud and failure in regards to their obligations. . .
.
Building Permit
This prints on 8.5 x11" and is in landscape format. .
How To Buld A Suit
. Original 2009 - still good
today - Nunc Pro Tunc .
Certificate Of Service
. Original 2009 - still good
today - Nunc Pro Tunc . .. .
Affidavit of Financial Statement (In Forma Pauperis)
. Original 2009 - still good today
- Nunc Pro Tunc . The Affidavit of Financial Statement can be utilized whenever you
are requested to submit finances for court filings. Courts attempt to hinder your access to the courts by requiring
filing fees which can be of a sizable amount and it hinders your access to the courts. However, this is 2-Fold.
1. It violates due process of law. The Constitution states ALL debts must be paid with gold or silver.
Filing "In Forma Pauperis" affirms you have no gold or silver in which to pay, and
thus relieves these restricting demands and ensures your contstituional rights to due process. 2.
They think it gives them leave to say you are a Pauper if you don't pay. We need to also correct our concept in that
we are NOT Paupers. Having 'money' or not does not definitively
make anyone a Pauper and there is a case law that says every natural
person must have access to all courts without having to pay. . .
UPDATE -- Removal To Supreme Court (Federal) 7/17/11
. The
Following 'Removal To Supreme Court', can be utilized as the 'Suit', and in replacement of "How To Build
A Suit". Upon your review of it, you will see that it is inclusive of all that is necessary to be stated for the
Record.
The use of Respondent / Defendant is contingent upon whether you are
making an initial suit, or responding to a suit or claim against you. To counter a matter or claim against you, you
are the Respondent to them or counter-Claimant. Either way, yes you are Responding. THey may also call you a Defendant.
But do not use 'defendant', if anything you are an 'Alleged Defendant'. If you are making an initial suit, you are the
Claimant or Affiant , or Plaintiff (refrain from using Petitioner) and those who would respond to your claim would be Respondents,
also called Defendants. You are making your claim to sue them and they must respond. Remember anything they send
you, even a traffic ticket they are actually suiting you, making a claim against you. . .
Removal To Supreme Court (Federal)
. Original 2011 - Still good today
- Nunc Pro Tunc .
. UPDATE - UPDATE 10/9/26 We have an updated the full set of instructions for Removals to
Supreme Court by way of Federal District Courts (the arm or avenue to Supreme Court), inclusive of how to fill out the civil
cover sheet, and an updated In Lieu of Informa Pauperis certified that covers all the stops and concerns they may have, or
attempt to have, regarding 'payment" to enter court claims and Removals. It consist of 6 culminated sessions.
You can obtain it for study and instructions on how to Remove to the Federal and will. You will find it on our expanded
site "Removal To Federal" . .
. WHEN YOUR "IN FORMA PAUPERIS"
IS DENIED! The following Writs
are an Answer to the Courts, who have denied your "Informa Pauperis, as if it is discretionary. Although this Writ
was not a Motion, this is a perfect example why Motions are discretionary. There are two Writs: a "Writ
Of Error" because they are attempting to make it discretionary but we know it is evidence and thereby they are "Tampering
With Evidence", which is an offense. The Second Writ is a "Writ In
the Nature of Discovery" requesting them to produce and substantiate their reasoning of denying it
and wherein you can express your addtional supports in law. .
Writ Of Error Regarding Denial of In Forma Pauperis
. Original 2011 - still
good today - Nunc Pro Tunc .
Writ Of Discovery Regarding Denial of In Forma Pauperis
. Original 2011 - still
good today - Nunc Pro Tunc . .
Records Correction
. Original 2011- still
good today - Nunc Pro Tunc . 10/9/26 UPDATE:
Go To our Expanded site for updated information on how to Utilize Informa Pauperis when doing a "Removal To Federal"
as everyone is supposed to have FREE acess to ALL courts and the fact that they do not have "MONEY- never did)
and / or certain Resources DOES NOT make them a Pauper. AND they cannot be made to fill out forms for eligibility
for something that is already available without ancillary legislation. But of course they want to give push back on
payment. You respond to them based on what they write to you. Once they wrote us back with examples of peole who applied
for Informa Pauperis, who were in prison facilities, however those examples did not and does not apply for the natural people
who are not in prison. It can become a back and forth of atleast 2 responses to them, yet in the end, your entry clears
the way, and eventually they will get the gist of the purpose if we could be unified in our knowledge. . .
Demand for Default Judgment
This Writ is utilized to demand a default
judgment if the court has not responded in a set amount of time. That time is usually set in the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedures, usually 10, 2, 30 days, reasonably. When you submit any "Affidavit of Fact"
it is important to give a time frame for them to respond. They must visit the document and show cause and proof
of their rebuttal (if any), as an Affidavit of Fact stands as truth unless proven otherwise, UNLESS the Affidavit is truly
FRIVIOLOUS on its face in the first instance. If it is a questionnaire, such as "Bill Of Particulars, or Writ In
The Nature Of Discovery", etc., they must answer it by the amount of time set. If they fail to respond in
that set time, that is an automatic Default. Please Note prior to making a Default, you must first submit "Notice
of Default". That is usually a 10 day window before you follow up with the Default Judgment. We
say why not send to Federal and let them Default. Having all of your documents marked with exhibts is certainly evidence
of evidence. Being sure to properly notify is also a huge part of Law, as one (any and all parties) must be served to
know they are being sued, that a claim is submitted against them. . .
8. Demand For Default Judgment
. Original 2011- still
good today - Nunc Pro Tunc .
. 10/9/26 Update in Addition: When you send or remove to the Federal, you can handle in such a way that the Federal does the Default. Having
all of your documents marked with exhibits is certainly evidence of evidence. Being sure to properly notify is also
an integral and important part of Law - called "Notice", as Law is Notice. Any and all parties must be served
and failure to serve destroys the action. One must know or have notice that they are being sued, that a claim is submitted
against them and conversely it gives the person being served opportunity to respond, rebut, or be heard .
Writ of Mandamus -- Enforcing The Law -- Notice To Higher Court This Writ is used to command the higher court's enforcement of the lower Court to adhere to the Law.
Therefore this is a Writ Of Mandamus. Be sure to send a copy to the to the State Attorney General's Office and
the Secretary Of State. It is important to send the proper responses regardless to what the lower says, does or not
does and remember your Writs are evidence and a paper trail of violations imposed upon you or violated against you, as it
is important that you correspond your position at all times. The example below is in regard to the lower court
refusing to acknowledge a Default Judgment. .
9. Writ of Mandamus
. Original 2011 - still good
today - Nunc Pro Tunc . . 10/9/26 Update: We prefer, and think it is best, to Remove the matter
to the Federal as the higher court, instead of any state courts' so-called higher courts. Remember, the highest court
in any state is the State Supreme Court and still it is for 14th amendment and corporate persons
and citizens. Therefore, there is usually no remedy at law because they act arbitrarily and not in positive law most
all of the time. We expect them to do what is right and exact in law, but since they act in Color-of-law and arbitrarily
and discretionally, meaning they are the law violators and are not interested in complying with law, they are interesetd in
play acting while robbing the people of their liberties and their finances and property. All this being done while they
are not sanctioned to be judicial venuesin thefirst place. They duped us all in their cloak, so we were expecting something
they do not have to give and are not interested in complying to the oath and affirmation they themselves took. But since they
are not sitting in real courts, it kind of washes itself out and the people bought their act for lack of knowledge.
That is why it is important to know atleast the basis of law and certainly know 'Due Process. Remember, a civilian means
one who is "skilled in the law'. So, the higher court to send to is best to be the Federal from inception, rather
than playing around with them in their lower courts while they postpone, hinder, and otherwise violate the law and due process
of Law. We spent quite a few sessions going over details of an Removal and culminated them into the "Removal To Federal". . . .
. Regarding E-Verify This Writ can be used for the following purposes: . 1. If
you have made a name correction at your place of employment, but have not made the correction at the social security, because
you do not wish to utilize social security. The Writ notifies terminatoin of your social security. . 2. E-Verify:
If you receive a letter from social security indicating a name mis-match, this letter may also come through your
employer. You need to notify social security with the information contained within this Writ, and send a copy to
your employer for the record. It is already established that one does not have to utilize social security to work on
a job. It is also established by law that social security is not an identification. Therefore to force anyone
to use it, is a violation of their constitutionally secured rights, a violation of law, and is discrimination. .
7. Response To Social Security / E-Verify
. . Update
10/9/26: Some people wish to change or correct their name on the
social security records. Others do not and deal in Ex Rel. There was a time when it was not a problem to bring
in your 1 page name correction and have it changed, however there were some who decided to make fake notaries and notary stamps, etc., which was totally not necessary.
All they needed to do was show their self-execuitng correction to the notary and make a sworn affidavit regarding it and /
or find a notary that overstands and respects national principles. Making fake notaries was a poor choice and it made
things more difficult and fed into an unecessary and dishonorable manner of taking action. Were you a party to that,
were you convinced by others to do that? If so you may be one of the Moors who say "this Moorish thing does not
work", when it was you who did not work. ..
. CONFUSED ABOUT TAXES?
. REGARDING CEASE AND DESIST WITH-HOLDING TAXES , 
Employers take with-holdings, referred to as
"income taxes" from your payroll check. It is important for you to know that your compensation wages are NOT
INCOME. Income is PROFITS from a Capitol or corporate investment. Many agree
that their labor compensation is Income by signing W-2’s and W-4’s. Thus they contract through the With-Holding Agent (employer), with the IRS (a private corporation).  .
You are contracting with the IRS, via your Employer, and giving them the authority to continue taking finances from you.
To pay, or not pay these
taxes is voluntary, therefore it is YOUR decision. But when you violate the contract you
made when signing the W2's and W4's, which admits you have income, and you don't terminate paying them properly, the IRS threatens to take you to TAX COURT, of which there is no such thing as Tax Court. It is usually an administrative hearing, held in some room or office. Thus, in actuality
they are taking you to “court” for breach of contract. So be careful of what you sign. See Book:
"Confused About Taxes", and Book: "How And Why Not To"
. After
your employer is informed of our intent to terminate taxes being taken out of your compensation check, for whatever reason,
be it because you know you are non-tax obligated or because you choose not to have them taken out. The payroll department, who by the way has no judicial power, nor do they have
the authority to make decisions regarding your personal financial affairs, will often respond asking if the forms you
sent in to Cease With-Holdings were Genuine IRS Forms. They
call that form a Certification Of Exemption. However, if someone, something, exempts you, they can un-exempt you.
You can just write something that terminates them succinctly,
it does nothave to be one of 'their forms'. The empoyer asking for that form is a matter of "pattern and practice" and can become intimidation tactics with-no-standing
lawfully. THere are many who have exercised this right successfully. . NOTE 10/9/26. They
stopped using the W4T terminate taxes form (Certification of Exemption) and they report now as if it never existed.
They even say the "people" made it up. But that is just not true AI. (We have, with no uncertain terms,
found that AI is programmed not to tell the absolute truth when it comes to taxes and to positive Law. You will
find the W4T form in the Civic Service book (we call it the pink book, as in their pink slip to cease from taxing your wages).
But don't use it, because they don't use it anymore. Still you can terminate. Just write plainly and simply your
positon regarding same. The truth is whether that form is no longer in existence or not, you still
have the absolute choice to not pay taxes, and not have them deducted from your wages, as they are VOLUNTARY. All Law is specific and it is in the wording you use. Many get tripped up because
they go with what they call common usage, without realizing it is common indoctrination. You
will find many other proofs that income tax deductions are voluntary on the "About Taxes" . If you choose to pay them, that is your choice, but don't complain about doing it and don't judge
those who choose not to and remember the more you make - the more they take. , .
. Regarding Validity of Termination Forms
. Almost undoutbtedly, you will get resistance, if not due to curiosity alone, from your
fellow work mates, even the one who is in charge of making adjustments to your pay check. Don't take it personally,
they are often following through with their limited instructions, and sometimes there exist a bit of jealousy, as to why YOU
don't have to pay taxes, and they do. Their capacity is limited and they are not used to the request, and the
employer gets tax kick-backs, as well as interest quarterly on the finances collected from your pay check. (that
may not be brought out, admitted, or even discussed, and it doesn't have to be). This is not a fight with
your employer, it certainly is not supposed to be. These are YOUR financial affairs, not theirs. You have
not asked them to be your personal financial advisor, only to make a change regarding your finances, of which they have no
real authority to refuse your personal request. Upon asking them to provide a delegation of authoirty, you will
see that this is true. They cannot provide it, becuase they don't have it. They may talk about policies, however
you are talking about Law, of which they are obligated not to break the law. Do not engage using email correspondence.
Be sure to utilize the mail, certified return receipt requested. Also be sure to send a carbon copy to whoever
is over the department, over the person who has the title to handle your request, and be sure to request in writing, a copy
of your correspondence to be placed into your employee file. . . .
10. To Employer Regarding Validity Of Termination Forms
, Update 10/9/26: They now attempt
to use the I-9 for employment verification. We now have a short writ to use for the I-9 questionnaire
and it is sufficient in your inquiry. Most all of the forms they present are actually bias and discriminating, even
though on the forms itself "itself it says they cannot discriminate for nationalty, religion, creed, etc., etc., Therein
lies your avenue. The I-9 we have on the expanded site is an excellent response for you to utilize. .
Updated February 2023 We have been assured all Proclamations previously submitted are being processed via the Connecticut location. PROCLAMATION SEALINGS WILL NO LONGER BE DONE AT CONNECTICUT. They
will be processed at New Jersey office location. . PROCLAMATION SEALINGS These are the First Two Writs you want to effectuate and have Sealed Please Review the Samples Below Before Filling Out and printing . When filling
out the Name Declaration and the Judicial Proclamation, please DO NOT hand write your information.
Fill -in where indicated by boxes. Below are the Documents and the sample explanations of
how your documents ought be filled out. One is the 'Name Correction" (Document #1 1 pg) and the other is the "Judicial
Notice and Proclamation' (Document #2 6 pgs). BE SURE TO UTILIZE
THE NEW "Updated Processing Form" BELOW. These instruction
are also found on the "National Identification Card and Proclamation" page along with instructions for card orders and a host of additional and useful information.
Proclamation Sealings will now be processed at R.V. Bey Publications New Jersey location. Be
sure to provide an email on the new updated processing form (below) that you must
send in with your Proclamations for contact and correspondence purposes. This will assure better expediency. These
changes make it so that Card orders and Proclamation Sealings are now sent to the same location. Once we receive your Proclamations, we will send an email confirming we have received
them. Be sure to provide an email on the updated processing form. We also added a direct link if making payment via paypal OR
you can use Cash App $RVBey, or a money order.
All Instructions and where
to mail are on the NEW Processing form itself. Direct Link for Proclamation Payment via Paypal
. Proclamations
MUST be mailed with the NEW processing form below
REVISED Proclamation Processing Form - 1 pg PDF
. . OR:
When ordering on the new expanded site, here is an option to fill out the form on-line and upload
it, autograph, print and photo for card(s). We left the Actual Proclamation Documents and the SAMPLE of how to fill them out Below. Some computer operating
systems print them out differently. Please make sure the 1 page name Correction prints out as 1 page and the 6 page
Judicial Notice prints out as 6 pages. The original font size for the body of the documents is 12 pt.
.
1. Name Declaration, Correction and Publication
Sample Name Correction and Declaration
.
2. Judicial Notice and Proclamation
Sample Judicial Notice and Proclamation
. . .
. Back To Top Of page
Back to Archive Home Page
Back to RVBeyonline Home page
|
